Find an Asbestos Litigation Firm That Specializes in Mesothelioma

It's best to hire a law firm specialized in the field you need help with. For instance, a lawyer who does nothing but car accidents wouldn't be competent to handle mesothelioma cases.

Attorneys who specialize in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation cases have the expertise and experience needed to help victims win compensation. These firms are also familiar with the most current laws and rulings pertaining to asbestos litigation.

Levy Konigsberg LLP

Levy Konigsberg LLP (LK) is a national asbestos litigation firm that has offices in New York and New Jersey. The firm's lawyers have secured multimillion-dollar settlements and verdicts for mesothelioma victims or asbestos cancer, as well as lead poisoning in New York, California, Georgia and across the nation. The firm's lawyers are also experienced in handling cases involving medical negligence, product liability, and consumer fraud.

In the last three decades, LK has represented victims of mesothelioma, asbestos-related diseases. Their lawyers have won some of the biggest jury verdicts ever for victims. The firm's attorneys have also successfully prosecuted high-profile litigations that involved toxic exposure as well as corporate wrongdoing.

The firm's lawyers are experienced in pursuing litigation in various cases against companies involved in the manufacture and distribution of asbestos. These include large corporations such as major construction firms and real estate owners. LK has also successfully sued asbestos producers in lawsuits that involve toxic contamination of military sites and industrial facilities.

The firm represents patients who have other personal injury claims as well as asbestos litigation defense victims. Among these are those who have been injured in accidents, car crashes, and by medical negligence. In some instances the firm represents families that have lost loved ones due to medical negligence.

Levy Konigsberg LLP attorneys have won many awards such as the Best Lawyer in America award for Personal Injury Lawyers, as well as Super Lawyers in Plaintiff Personal Injury. U.S. News & World Report has also ranked them as one of the most reputable mesothelioma law firms.

LK has been fighting for justice on behalf thousands of people, women and children who have been deemed as having asbestos-related diseases. Their clients are mostly residents of Maryland and other states across the country. They were exposed to toxic substances in the workplace and consequently were diagnosed with serious health issues such as mesothelioma asbestosis, and lung cancer.

Attorneys at LK have licenses to practice law in New York, New Jersey and federal district courts across the 50 states. Individual attorneys are also licensed to practice in other states, based on their background and specialization in asbestos litigation.

Waters Kraus & Paul

If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with Mesothelioma it is essential to find an attorney who can assist you in obtaining the justice you are entitled to. The mesothelioma attorneys at Waters Kraus & Paul have vast experience in this complicated area of the law and are committed to helping their clients get the best possible results. They don't resolve cases quickly, and they are dedicated to obtaining the most amount of compensation that they can for their clients.

The firm is a top national law firm with offices in Dallas, Texas; Los Angeles, California; and Moline, Illinois. The attorneys of the firm represent people from all 50 states and also from several countries around the world. They have won hundreds of millions in settlements and verdicts for their clients. They are also dedicated to defending the rights of victims in asbestos litigation. They have served on numerous advisory committees for asbestos bankruptcy creditors and trustees.

Peter Kraus is a founding partner of Waters Kraus & Paul and is an expert in toxic tort, pharmaceutical injury, and False Claims Act whistleblower cases. He has tried a number of asbestos, poisoning benzene exposure and pharmaceutical cases to a verdict in state and federal courts across the nation including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He has also appeared before the Texas Legislature and Congress on behalf of asbestos victims.

In the past, asbestos plaintiffs' firms hired people suffering from asbestos-related illnesses and then bundled them up to file lawsuits in large quantities. These tactics were intended to overburden the court system and defraud defendants. However, since the passage of Senate Bill 15, this practice has been largely eliminated in Texas and across the United States.

Peter Kraus believes that Garlock Sealing Technologies' claim is absurd. He says that none of the firm's clients ever concealed anything from Garlock and that the company's allegations are unsubstantiated. Waters Kraus & Paul lawyers believe that honesty is the best security for their clients and their families.

Weitz & Luxenberg

Mesothelioma patients need a firm that has the resources, perseverance and experience to secure fair compensation. The national law firm of Weitz & Luxenberg has helped asbestos victims win billions of dollars in settlements and verdicts since its founding since 1986. The litigation teams, which comprise over 90 lawyers, are renowned for their smart negotiation strategies and quick bargaining techniques. They will do whatever it takes to bring your case to a swift and satisfactory conclusion.

Mesothelioma is a debilitating disease that can cause physical, emotional, and financial hardship for victims and their families. Exposure to asbestos can trigger this cancer that can manifest and cause death for a long time. Many companies knowingly put profits over worker safety, failing to disclose the risks of their products.

People who were exposed to asbestos or worked around it have an increased risk of developing asbestos-related ailments which include mesothelioma as well as lung cancer. Workers often brought asbestos fibers home in their clothing or on their skin, which they then passed on to family members. Asbestos victims are entitled to compensation for their ailments from the companies responsible for their exposure.

Weitz & Luxenberg is a firm with offices in New York, as well as throughout the United States. The firm's attorneys have helped asbestos victims obtain more than $17 billion in settlements and verdicts for their clients. Its attorneys are dedicated to making the process as easy and stress-free for mesothelioma victims as possible.

Asbestos litigation has gained prominence in recent years and the firm is recognized as a pioneer in this field of law. The firm's founders, Perry Weitz and Arthur Luxenberg, have vast experience in asbestos lawsuits. They also have secured some of the largest settlements in mesothelioma litigation history.

The firm has a significant presence in New York, and one of its first wins was a 75 million-dollar verdict for 36 workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. In that case, the jury granted an engineer who worked on brakes one of the largest verdicts for a single plaintiff.

Venus Burns Leonard Sandoval and Josiah Parker are part of the legal team at Weitz & Luxenberg. James McWilliams was diagnosed mesothelioma when he was 81. The legal team won an award of $23 million at trial. The verdict gave him $13 million for his pain and suffering in the past and another $10 million for future medical expenses. The team also won another $23 in a consolidated case for five former Jenkins Bros. Shipfitters. Judge Joan Madden combined the cases to make it more difficult for the defendants to settle.

Chris Panatier

Chris Panatier is a trial lawyer who represents victims of toxic exposures. His skills are evident both in the over $150 million verdicts he has obtained for his clients and in the professional recognition he has received by his colleagues. His practice is devoted to toxic torts. He has a wealth of experience in asbestos litigation and mesothelioma. He also has vast experience in the fields of pharmaceuticals, commercial disputes, product liability and catastrophic personal injury and wrongful deaths.

Asbestos is a poisonous mineral that can trigger life-threatening diseases like mesothelioma. The condition typically develops over the years after exposure, and it is difficult to determine. Asbestos exposure can occur in many ways, such as manufacturing, mining and home construction. Most asbestos exposure cases happen in the workplace.

The state of California has numerous sites where asbestos was used in the past, including factories and shipyards. These areas are usually infected with asbestos due to its fire resistance and insulation properties. Additionally, sites that are contaminated can be breeding grounds for dangerous viruses and bacteria. Asbestos is also found in soil and drinking water.

While most asbestos litigation online was removed from the environment by the mid-1980s. However, contaminated sites still pose an hazard to the public's health. The state has strict environmental laws to protect residents and workers. Asbestos lawsuits are complicated, and it's important to consult a mesothelioma lawyer who is experienced.

During closing arguments, Chris Panatier used a analogy from an ice cream parlor to convey his point with jurors in the Johnson & Johnson talc case. His inventive approach helped him reach a landmark verdict. He represented four plaintiffs who claimed J&J talc was the reason of mesothelioma.

The jury awarded $21.7 Million to Joanne Anderson, her husband poisoning and their children who were exposed to asbestos through the baby powder produced by the company. The jury awarded $4 million in punitive damage. The family also sued J&J's suppliers, including Imerys SA and Honeywell International.

Just a few blocks away from J&J headquarters the jury delivered its verdict. The jury ruled that the company was aware of asbestos' dangers in its talc, but did not warn its customers. The plaintiffs' attorney, Moshe Konigsberg of Levy Konigsberg in New York, along with associate Christopher Panatier from Simon Greenstone Panatier in Dallas, argued the company had "maliciously or willfully disregarded" for plaintiffs’ safety.