Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Asbestos lawsuits have led to the bankruptcy of many companies. A knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer will help you secure compensation.

Experts in the health field have warned for decades about the dangers of exposure to asbestos. Yet, Asbestos Lawsuit History industry leaders downplayed the risks. Over time, asbestos-related diseases became more common.

The Third Case

Asbestos litigation really took off in the 1970s after research studies began to link asbestos to severe illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis lawsuit settlements. Since these diseases typically don't manifest until years after exposure, thousands of lawsuits were filed. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws.

Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos products. This case had a significant impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s it was discovered that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, put profits over the health and safety of his employees. Deposition testimony revealed that Brown was heavily influenced the chief medical advisor of the company Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was a physician who was famous for his indifference for employees' health was a well-known persona.

The evidence showed that Johns Manville knew about the asbestos lawsuit settlements dangers but took no action to protect its workers. The court ruled that the company is accountable for any damages suffered by workers who later develop mesothelioma or other asbestos-related illnesses. The court also found that the company was responsible for damages for families of deceased employees.

After the ruling in Borel, Asbestos Lawsuit History many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies who used asbestos. Most of the claims were denied due to how long does a asbestos lawsuit take variety of reasons. Some cases were permitted to proceed, and the courts drew up a series of guidelines that guide the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s asbestos defendants were seeking legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to be able argue that asbestos materials were not component of their product and therefore they shouldn't be held responsible for injuries caused by people who employed with it. These claims were unsuccessful and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to recognize the "veterans asbestos lawsuits product" defense.

Today, a mesothelioma patient's right to seek compensation from accountable parties in the case is protected by federal and state law. Insurance companies continue to fight against these claims.