The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous celebs were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable sites offering both free casino-style video games and financially rewarding prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as standard casinos, just without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the business faces accusations of unlawful sports betting in a New York lawsuit that declares VGW uses star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a range of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of - however not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads typically focus around the social element of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for actual sports betting losses.

Others lure consumers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and estates before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever gave up.'

The inconsistency in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps clients never ever buy,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting sites.'

Social gambling establishments provide customers a possibility to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the choice to purchase worthless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for genuine money, however can be used to unlock different features within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, allowing customers to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but seven states, which has assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't need generally require recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to send mail-in demands for complimentary sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, consequently providing them a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is simply a method of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never have to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and traditional online gambling sites like casinos.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's uses its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the chance to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself does not fulfill the meaning of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all sort of daily companies in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are regularly utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling industry experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're normally not connected to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the attributes commonly associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the normal payment percentage for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is a minor share of the revenue made by the company [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, using customers the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have considering that been shuttered over claims of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is among several star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos must face similar scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state lawyer generals as essential elements in determining that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for .'

One of the gambling establishment market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up significant tax and income chances as this gaming changes that carried out through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current lawsuit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been called as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.

'We normally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, creating not only great games, user experiences and entertainment, but also guaranteeing this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to intensely protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The problems in between standard online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might prove bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to project a strong stance versus illegal gaming - especially when trying to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting supposedly illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also ignored to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to customers the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our worths are" our gamers come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious unlawful gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some danger that state regulators and state attorneys general rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton