Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Asbestos lawsuits have led to the bankruptcies of a number of businesses. A knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer will help you obtain compensation.

Experts in the field of health have warned for decades about the dangers asbestos exposure. Industry leaders have downplayed the dangers. As time went on, asbestos-related diseases were becoming more prevalent.

The Third Case

Asbestos-related lawsuits started to gain momentum in the 1970s after studies by scientists began to link asbestos cancer lawsuit mesothelioma settlement to serious illnesses like asbestosis or mesothelioma. Since these diseases typically don't show symptoms until decades after exposure, tens of thousands of lawsuits were filed. A majority of these lawsuits were filed in Texas which had favorable laws made it a preferred location for this litigation saga.

Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s & 1950s of asbestos products. This case had a major Asbestos exposure Lawsuit Settlements impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s, it came to be known that the company's chief executive Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. Deposition testimony revealed that Brown was heavily influenced by his company's chief medical advisor Asbestos Exposure lawsuit settlements Dr. Russell Budd. Budd, a doctor who was known for his smug disregard for the health of employees was a well-known persona.

Johns Manville was found to have been aware of asbestos exposure lawsuit settlements' dangers however, they did not take any action asbestos class to protect their employees. The court found that the company is accountable for any damages suffered by workers who later develop mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases. The court also held the company liable for damages to the families of employees who died.

Following the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that made use of this material. Unfortunately, the majority of claims were denied due to various reasons. A few cases were allowed to proceed and the courts set up a set of guidelines that have guided the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s asbestos defendants were seeking legal rulings to restrict their liability. For instance they wanted to argue that the asbestos materials were not part of their product and thus shouldn't be held accountable for injuries to people who worked with asbestos. These claims were unsuccessful and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to uphold the "asbestos product" defense.

Today, mesothelioma victims' right to pursue compensation from accountable parties in a case is protected under federal and state law. However insurance companies continue fight these claims with a hammer and a sledgehammer.